The Infrastructure We Build - Dispatch One
- Mark Fukae
- 3 days ago
- 2 min read

By Mark Fukae - Director of Advocacy - Professionals Who Care
This week, the orthopedic imaging confirmed callus formation at the fracture site around my mother Rose's hip prosthesis. For a periprosthetic fracture in a 94-year-old with advanced dementia, callus is the word you want to hear. The body building new bone without instruction, without authorization, without a care plan that accounts for it. Infrastructure, cellular-level.
At the same moment, CASI received a direct invitation to attend office hours with the Colorado Commission on Medicaid's facilitating organization - August 4, 9am - after five hours of Commission testimony on July 28 passed without a single mention of the family caregiver-to-institutionalization cost curve. Not the N_crit calculation. Not the 33-person threshold. Not the actuarial void.
The gap wasn't contested. It wasn't in the room.
This is what CASI was built for: to bring into the room what the system assumes exists and has never actually built. The Caring Costs Survey. The N_crit threshold. The preemption gap analysis. The fiscal architecture of the Colorado CARE Act - which, if passed, would add family caregiver status as a protected class under CADA and require a documented interactive process before flexible work arrangements are denied.
At home, a network of sensors, bed alarms, and smart bulbs watches while Rose sleeps. In the legislature, a fiscal note, a revised Section 1, and a Senate sponsor deadline of September 30 marks the campaign's current edge. At the Commission table, a presentation slot target - August 20 or September 2.
The same work. The same argument. The same week.
The Change.org petition stands at 806 signatures, 194 from 1,000. Senators Amabile, Mullica, and Bennet are named targets of this petition. Decision makers are watching.
Sign and Share the revised Petition: https://chng.it/DLWncS9wtT
Read the full dispatch: The Revenue Neutral Caregiver on Substack.
